I've not looked at those particular transactions in any detail, but in general one should also check that transactions are at arm's length, to determine if they are worth reporting. Even within SEC filings that I go through, there are cases where the buyer was associated with the seller (e.g. owner/manager/shareholder, etc.), so the deal isn't worthy of being reported.
With crypto, there is widespread "wash trading" going on, so one should be extra cautious to make sure that the deals are actually at arm's length.
I've not checked the ones that have reported on in this instance, but if someone has the time they should go through the historical WHOIS, etc., to make sure, otherwise folks can end up being misled about the state of the real market. With crypto, a lot of parties want anonymity, which makes this much harder, obviously.