Looks a little hypocritical to me. Whilst I'm ok with people that feel the need to protect their identity in a political, famous actor, rock star, company secrets classified for internal use only, etc. type situation, I think that there are a lot of usages by companies and individuals that reach outside the logical norm of the service.
There's really no way to effectively manage who's using privacy authentically or unethically until it comes down the pike for resell and someone gets burned. There's always a chance that the guy/gal you are about to buy from is actually a famous actor hiding their fame (which is totally understandable). The odds of that are on the low end, but it could and has happened.
The privacy debate has always been a hard one due to both sides having legitimate facts and statistics to back them up. I'm not sure there is a fool proof way to offer any form of compromise when it comes to this topic without alienating someone elses rights to privacy for legitimate reasons.