Ok, so I have contemplated on these two for a while - asking myself the question "does the 's' kill the name?" And to be honest I still haven't decided
... part of me is saying yes they are horrible, then another part of me is saying hmmm, does the .TV extension actually pull the name through and make it good? (I know the keywords are great which if / when I develop them the search engines will like with or without the 's')
I then started thinking, out of the plural and singular version (which online.tv own) is the plural better?
i.e. does ENGLANDS.TV work better than ENGLAND.TV and LONDONS.TV work better than LONDON.TV?
Well, the patriot in me made the decision in the end and I went for them.
Incidently, AMERICAS.TV, NEWYORKS.TV, MANHATTANS.TV, INDIAS.TV, AUSTRALIAS.TV (plus a boat load more)... are all taken.
And if you like them MILANS.TV and GERMANYS.TV are (were) available.
Your thoughts appreciated guys
I then started thinking, out of the plural and singular version (which online.tv own) is the plural better?
i.e. does ENGLANDS.TV work better than ENGLAND.TV and LONDONS.TV work better than LONDON.TV?
Well, the patriot in me made the decision in the end and I went for them.
Incidently, AMERICAS.TV, NEWYORKS.TV, MANHATTANS.TV, INDIAS.TV, AUSTRALIAS.TV (plus a boat load more)... are all taken.
And if you like them MILANS.TV and GERMANYS.TV are (were) available.
Your thoughts appreciated guys















