discuss Exploring the Potential of .ml Domains: A Thread on Machine Learning Extensions.

[Pusang Gala]

Hi folks!

Share your thoughts on the potential of .ml extensions in the tech space. Despite being one of the most abused TLDs, some are investing in it. Is it due to the association with machine learning, mirroring the rise of .ai for artificial intelligence?

Will .ml become synonymous with machine learning websites? Predictions, opinions, and speculations are welcome .

 

[branding]

MarkMonitor Inc. currently have 33 .HORSE domains.
CSC Corporate Domains have around 14.
————
MarkMonitor Inc. have 322 .ML domains (clocking up to 25% of the number of MarkMonitor's .AI's...)
CSC Corporate Domains have around 211.

Do the math. Then ask ChatGPT why .ML may be trending.

It is not .AI - but it's not down there with .Horse
They are 3 different animals.

I disagree. Do your DD on those MLs and you know why.

Why ask ai? It gets fed by the same nonsense that's feeding domainers into thinking some losing extensions are the next big thing.

Its like a self for filling prophecy. ML is crap. 100%.

 

[branding]

On the chance of derailing the thread, people bet/rely too much on ai. As it is, its performing subpar and I'm not slightly impressed by the accuracy of whatever it spits out.

It helps Automation, but that's just about it.

Factoring in the funds used to make that happen, i'm not impressed at all.

 

[Pusang Gala]

I cannot stress enough, DD on ml. Its right up there with .horse.

Lol .ml certainly not in the same category as .horse.

 

[Pusang Gala]

Domaim trends can change ovr time, and perceptions about domain extensions can evolve. While .ml may curtrently have a mixed reputation, the rapid advancements in machine learning could shift its value and relevance, much like what we witnessed with .xyz.
Regarding AI and its outputs, it's crucial to remember that AI is a tool and not infallible. It provides insights based on patterns in the data it's trained on. The skepticism around AI-generated information is understandable, but dismissing the potential of .ml based solely on historical performance might overlook the dynamic nature of tech adoption and market trends. Ultimately, the debate around .ml's potential is part of a broader conversation about how emerging technologies influence domain value. The future may hold unexpected shifts, and being open to these possibilities can sometimes yield surprising opportunities.,

 

[freety85]

On the chance of derailing the thread, people bet/rely too much on ai. As it is, its performing subpar and I'm not slightly impressed by the accuracy of whatever it spits out.

It helps Automation, but that's just about it.

Factoring in the funds used to make that happen, i'm not impressed at all.

While it's true that AI currently has limitations in accuracy, the advancements witnessed in just the past 18 months are significant. This rapid progress suggests a promising future. Industry analysts predict a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 35%- 42% for AI/ML, indicating continued expansion in the coming years. Recent funding fluctuations may pose temporary challenges, and not all AI-related ventures will secure investment. However, the core potential of AI and machine learning technologies remains undeniable, and they are poised to play a vital role in shaping the future. The observed applications of this extension beyond its core machine learning function is encouraging. It suggests broader potential, and close monitoring of this segment for future developments is warranted.

 

[branding]

I'll add this and then shut up, .ml is just as flawed as AI is atm.

Don't fall for it. Dot ML will never be a recognised tld and is most certainly not worth investing in.

Just basic common sense.

 

[branding]

Lol .ml certainly not in the same category as .horse.

I agree... Lower category as its tainted by spam, scams, spoofing and what else.

 

[branding]

My final words, for real. You guys should really read up on .ml, it's history, it's owners. Just because you came up with the illusion that it might be a fitting abbreviation for something which is ( to be bebated) trending doesn't make it worthwhile investing in.

Dot ml never had and never will have a future.

 

[HotKey]

The ML space seems to be heating up (thanks to the Elephant in the room, AI).
Thanks for sharing.

Like, burning up? Into a cold sputtering ember

Srsly guys you're reaching I can't even think of a proper acronym and I promise you machine learning isn't it. A handful of multi-million/billion dollar corps buy into every ccTLD imaginable for brand protection or geo-centric purposes but it's no proper investment gauge.

 

[MattDomainNames]

I bought about a dozen of these in January. Do I think these will be the next .com or .ai? No, definitely not. However, I think it could become what .io is to .com in the next 2-4 years.

In other words:

Just as .io is to .com, .ml might be to .ai.

Seems like a low risk speculative investment at only around $10/domain. I think the potential ROI is much higher than handregging some .coms

Best of luck!

 

[branding]

I think the potential ROI is much higher than handregging some .coms

Most definitely not.

And you're skipping alterior methods of acquiring domains. A dozen .MLs will set you back like, maybe $150. You can put that same amount towards acquiring maybe 2 decent .coms and rest assured you will sell with profit.

That dozen MLs will however, expire and drop when time comes.

Besides, there's close to zero action in the .ml namespace. Hardly any sales history whatsoever. No usage either. It's an ugly looking extension (even compared to XYZ) with a shady history and a reputation to be used by scammers and spoofers.

If you're looking to gamble, there's plenty of better cctlds to put your money on with way better chances of making an actual profit.

Steer clear from this extension.

 

[Future Sensors]

Steer clear from this extension.

Thanks for warning the community.

 

[freety85]

Most definitely not.

And you're skipping alterior methods of acquiring domains. A dozen .MLs will set you back like, maybe $150. You can put that same amount towards acquiring maybe 2 decent .coms and rest assured you will sell with profit.

That dozen MLs will however, expire and drop when time comes.

Besides, there's close to zero action in the .ml namespace. Hardly any sales history whatsoever. No usage either. It's an ugly looking extension (even compared to XYZ) with a shady history and a reputation to be used by scammers and spoofers.

If you're looking to gamble, there's plenty of better cctlds to put your money on with way better chances of making an actual profit.

Steer clear from this extension.

Thank you for your feedback. While the .ML extension has a history of being used for free domains, it's important to consider recent developments. Since the freenom contract ended in July 2023, the extension has seen increased registrar support and transitioned to a paid registration model, which discourages spam.

While there may not be widely reported sales data, it's difficult to definitively say there's no end-user adoption. It's also worth noting that Swetha's focus on the .XYZ extension started in 2015, she only started reporting in 2020. What do you think she did in the meantime: sold cheaper and stocked up inventory... What makes you think there are no unreported sales, offers for the extension if you don't have a single name, how can you build data?

Regarding usage, several existing sites demonstrate the viability of the .ML extension for brand building ( a decent sample mentioned earlier in the thread- simply do a search in Google: site:.ml [ ml ] or site:.ml [ AI ]). While some businesses may still use keyword combinations with.COM (keyword+ML.com), or used as a redirect the increasing popularity of alternative extensions like .AI suggests a shift in preferences.

As someone who prioritizes .COM sales, I remain open to the potential of other extensions like .VC, .ML. I am not trying to convince you since your opinion is clear, but this is my perspective. Nobody should put all their eggs in one basket, simply we are talking about potential of this extension here...

 

[branding]

While the .ML extension has a history of being used for free domains

The namespace was dead, even when you could have had them for free. Go figure

simply we are talking about potential of this extension here...

Which is close to zero. There are plenty of speculative ngTLDs, cctlds I'm not a fan of but could see taking off if you get lucky, ml happens to be not one of them. It's a very far fetched bet.

I am not trying to convince you since your opinion is clear

Likewise. Just trying to warn people new to domaining. These kind of threads pop up now and then, usually 'promoting' any given obscure extension as there are available one word domains.

This one is the the worst I've ever seen. I really have no words for it. It's like, RM posting a thread about the rise of hyphenated domains or pushing .realty domains.

People will buy into it. With the aforementioned examples your would at least have a small chance of making money.

With .ml, you better spend it at the lottery. Its right up there with .it.com.... on seconds thought, it's even worse.

Let's look at the data....

Even .horse outperforms .ml, by a long shot. Especially in 2024. Go figure.